
In response, there have been increasing efforts by leading tech companies-and vocal calls by security professionals-to “de-platform” ISIS, meaning to reduce and ideally eliminate its presence on technology platforms. In the past few years, jihadist groups like ISIS initially relied on open Application Programming Interface (API) platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and Tumblr to distribute such content and help them recruit worldwide. ISIS has utilized propaganda to its advantage, not only to bolster its expansion in Iraq and Syria but also to recruit followers and disseminate the group’s ideology worldwide. The permanent shutdown is not until March 15th.Īs in actions/checkout issue 14, you can add as a first step:Īctionpack (7.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/routing/polymorphic_routes.rb:231:in `public_send'Īctionpack (7.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/routing/polymorphic_routes.rb:231:in `polymorphic_method'Īctionpack (7.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/routing/polymorphic_routes.The online media platforms of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) blend graphic audiovisual content with religious writings to sanction and justify violent terrorist attacks throughout the world.

Plus, this is still only the brownout period, so the protocol will only be disabled for a short period of time, allowing developers to discover the problem. Personally, I consider it less an "issue" and more "detecting unmaintained dependencies". The entire Internet has been moving away from unauthenticated, unencrypted protocols for a decade, it's not like this is a huge surprise. Second, check your package.json dependencies for any git:// URL, as in this example, fixed in this PR. This will help clients discover any lingering use of older keys or old URLs.
Latest stable rocketchat full#
This is the full brownout period where we’ll temporarily stop accepting the deprecated key and signature types, ciphers, and MACs, and the unencrypted Git protocol. See " Improving Git protocol security on GitHub". deploy/build",įirst, this error message is indeed expected on Jan. "build": "react-scripts build & mv build. In both cases, the control remains unchanged visually.
Latest stable rocketchat update#
(Then update App.cs to set MainPage to the right example.)īoth examples have a very simple situation: a control with two-way binding to a view-model, and a button that updates the view-model property (to simulate "the data has been modified elsewhere" in the real app). Each example is independent of the other - you can try just one.
Latest stable rocketchat code#
The sample code below can be added directly a "File new project" MAUI app (with a name of "MauiPlayground" to use the same namespaces), or it's all available from my demo code repo.

The sample code is all below, but the fundamental question is whether this a bug somewhere in my code (do I need to "tell" the controls to update themselves for some reason?) or possibly a bug in MAUI (in which case I should presumably report it)? Sample code Label and Checkbox) are visually updated, indicating that the view model notification is working fine and the UI itself is generally healthy.īuild environment: Visual Studio 2022 17.2.0 preview 2.1Īpp environment: Android, either emulator "Pixel 5 - API 30" or a real Pixel 6 The problem I'm facing is that changes to the view model are not visually propagated to the Switch.IsToggled and ListView.SelectedItem properties, even though the controls do raise events showing that they've "noticed" the property changes. I'm using 2-way data binding in my MAUI app: changes to the data can either come directly from the user, or from a background polling task that checks whether the canonical data has been changed elsewhere. ( CollectionView has similar issues, but other confounding factors that make it trickier to demonstrate.)

It's entirely possible that they're different problems that just share some common symptoms though. This question is about two MAUI controls ( Switch and ListView) - I'm asking about them both in the same question as I'm expecting the root cause of the problem to be the same for both controls.
